SBK SolutionsDigital Transformation Partner for SMEs
← All articles
Wrike & Project Managementby Roberto Benanti4 min read

How we train teams on Wrike: the method for real, widespread adoption

Why traditional Wrike training doesn't work

The most common model involves two hours of training with a consultant, an explanation of the main features and a few practical exercises. The team leaves motivated, but after ten days half the group still hasn't created their first task. The recurring reasons are always the same: lack of context, the strength of previous habits and the absence of mechanisms that make using the platform necessary.

Our method: three phases for real adoption

Phase 1. The platform is configured before the team even sees it: real projects, tasks and statuses already in place, not an empty space. This reduces the cognitive load on first access.

Phase 2. Contextual training, not generic: each person learns exactly what they need in their own role. Those who manage projects learn dependencies, those who collaborate learn status updates, those who administer learn intake forms.

Phase 3. Hands-on support in the first four weeks, with weekly check-ins to resolve real operational blockers that surface during actual work. This is the phase that prevents the typical post-launch abandonment.

The role of the internal champion

A crucial element is identifying an "internal champion" in the team, ideally the most digitally curious person. This person learns Wrike before their colleagues and becomes their daily point of reference, answering questions without always needing to involve the external consultant. Implementations with an internal champion record significantly higher adoption rates.

How we measure adoption

Real adoption is measured through three behavioural indicators:

  • Questions about the project are asked inside Wrike, not over email or chat.
  • Status updates are entered independently, without external reminders.
  • New team members learn Wrike from colleagues, not from the consultant.

What's different from standard training

The main difference isn't the number of hours, but the timing: the work begins before the team sees the tool and continues through the first weeks of real use, not just during the formal session. It takes a slightly larger upfront investment, but it produces lasting adoption instead of temporary enthusiasm.

Facing a similar problem in your company?

Tell us about your situation in a free exploratory call. Short, no commitment.

Book a consultation